But then again if Kobe has Gasol he really shouldn't be taking that many shots unless he has to. Jordan didn't have a post player like Gasol in either of the three-peat runs.Yep, greatest player of all-time.
The stats are just available for when Kobe has games where he doesn't pass the ball enough.
If Bryant were to shoot an average of 33 times in this series, half of TLN would be moaning about Gasol not getting enough touches. Hell, they already are.
Seeing MJ shoot 36, 43 and 37 times in three consecutive NBA Finals games...pretty crazy.
Jordan's six Finals appearances
#21
Posted June 11, 2009 - 04:13 PM
#22
Posted June 11, 2009 - 04:18 PM
How did rap music go from really good to so dry?
Real artists get shelved and whack one's get famous
To leave masses brainless, a smart mind is dangerous
In their eyes there probably ain't no real [expletive] in your playlist
You're just a product of what the government has created
#23
Posted June 11, 2009 - 04:22 PM
#24
Posted June 11, 2009 - 04:59 PM
though Jordan was greater than Kobe, its not by much. And I still believe that one's career doesnt dictate how good they were. I mean Karl Malone never won, and he was better than Tim Duncan IMO. CB was better than Garnett to me
#25
Posted June 11, 2009 - 05:23 PM
Horace Grant had a season of 14/10 on 58% shooting for the Bulls, on 10 shot attempts per game. That's a similar, maybe better, percentage than what Gasol puts up for us.But then again if Kobe has Gasol he really shouldn't be taking that many shots unless he has to. Jordan didn't have a post player like Gasol in either of the three-peat runs.
And even then, he still had Scottie, who is twice the player Gasol is.
#26
Posted June 11, 2009 - 05:26 PM
#27
Posted June 11, 2009 - 07:01 PM
Horace Grant wasn't a post player tho. Bill Cartwright was the man in the middle for the Bulls back then. Grant was a mid range shooter.Horace Grant had a season of 14/10 on 58% shooting for the Bulls, on 10 shot attempts per game. That's a similar, maybe better, percentage than what Gasol puts up for us.
And even then, he still had Scottie, who is twice the player Gasol is.
But even with that aside, my point is that if Jordan had had a post player of Pau's caliber you probably never would've seen some of those 33 field goal attempt games. The game is made easier for a dominant guard like Jordan and Kobe with a great post player.
Horace Grant wasn't nearly as talented on offense as Pau is.
Edited by Casper, June 11, 2009 - 07:14 PM.
#28
Posted June 11, 2009 - 07:11 PM
but he was equally effective overallHorace Grant wasn't a post player tho. Bill Cartwright was the man in the middle for the Bulls back then. Grant was a mid range shooter.
But even with that aside, my point is that if Jordan had had a post player if Pau's caliber you probably never would've seen some of those 33 field goal attempt games. The game is made easier for a dominant guard like Jordan and Kobe with a great post player.
Horace Grant wasn't nearly as talented on offense as Pau is.
#29
Posted June 11, 2009 - 07:15 PM
So do you think we would still be as good as we are with Pau if we were to replace him with Horace Grant? If not then what you say doesn't flow with my point.but he was equally effective overall
#30
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:00 PM
...and replace Odom with Pippen?So do you think we would still be as good as we are with Pau if we were to replace him with Horace Grant? If not then what you say doesn't flow with my point.
Yes.
#31
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:06 PM
No, just Gasol and Grant....and replace Odom with Pippen?
Yes.
#32
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:07 PM
Jordan had both Grant and Pippen to pass to. That's my point.No, just Gasol and Grant.
#33
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:10 PM
not completely his fault but still
#34
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:12 PM
Jordan had both Grant and Pippen to pass to. That's my point.
But that doesn't flow with Casper's point.
#35
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:12 PM
exactly and thats why kobe shooting too much is an issue
#36
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:16 PM
Pippen was great but as I said before, Grant was a mid range shooter. He wasn't as dependable a player down low as Pau is, nor did he possess Pau's repertoire. Argue that Grant shot a high field goal percentage but you can't compare his offense to Pau's. If he was that good of an offensive player Jordan would've trusted him more.Jordan had both Grant and Pippen to pass to. That's my point.
#37
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:17 PM
It looks like Jordan didn't trust many people at all in the second three-peat, and this is coming from a huge, huge Jordan fan.Pippen was great but as I said before, Grant was a mid range shooter. He wasn't as dependable a player down low as Pau is, nor did he possess Pau's repertoire. Argue that Grant shot a high field goal percentage but you can't compare his offense to Pau's. If he was that good of an offensive player Jordan would've trusted him more.
#38
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:18 PM
Well that doesn't matter because I was the one responding to him.But that doesn't flow with Casper's point.
#39
Guest_Chicano_*
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:18 PM
#40
Posted June 11, 2009 - 11:19 PM
MJ is not free from criticism and neither is kobe
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












