Kobe Repeat
#1
Posted July 24, 2008 - 06:37 PM
#2
Posted July 24, 2008 - 10:39 PM
#3
Posted July 24, 2008 - 10:51 PM
i do wanna see another laker on the all-star team tho
#4
Posted July 25, 2008 - 09:33 AM
but if he do gets it...i'll still celebrate for he is our own!!!
#5
Posted July 25, 2008 - 09:38 AM
#6
Posted July 25, 2008 - 02:39 PM

#7
Posted July 25, 2008 - 08:35 PM
1- Both Chris Paul and Lebron James suffer season ending injuries and/or die.
2- MVP voters stop hating Kobe...

#8
Posted July 25, 2008 - 08:48 PM
and CP3 and LBJ have lower numbers, even just a little, next year.

#9
Posted July 25, 2008 - 08:54 PM
2002: Tim Duncan
2003: Tim Duncan
2004: Kevin Garnett
2005: Steve Nash
2006: Steve Nash
2007: Dirk Nowitzki
2008: Kobe Bryant
2009: Kobe Bryant?

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#10
Posted July 25, 2008 - 09:35 PM
Why? Because in order to win the MVP, there must be something special about your season. Remember, this is the MEDIA who chooses the winner of the award. It is all about marketability and the best thing to market is a good story.
2007-2008: Lakers go from turmoil to top team in the West.
2006-2007: In general this was a slow year, but Dirk's team winning 67 games was the huge story.
2005-2006: Even without Amare, JJ, and Q-Rich, Nash leads the Suns to the top of the West.
2004-2005: Nash joins the Suns and complete turns them around.
What was the one thing people focused on with Chris Paul while he was the favorite: he saved New Orleans basketball and took the team from being out of the playoffs to first in the West.
Unless the Lakers give the media some kind of story that will sell, don't expect Kobe to get the MVP.
Look for James to get the award if Cleveland gets anywhere near 50+ wins. If not, I fully expect the award to go to Chris Paul since he supposedly "deserved" it this year as well.

#11
Posted July 25, 2008 - 09:40 PM
Kobe Bryant will not win the MVP next year unless the Lakers do something extraordinary.
Why? Because in order to win the MVP, there must be something special about your season. Remember, this is the MEDIA who chooses the winner of the award. It is all about marketability and the best thing to market is a good story.
2007-2008: Lakers go from turmoil to top team in the West.
2006-2007: In general this was a slow year, but Dirk's team winning 67 games was the huge story.
2005-2006: Even without Amare, JJ, and Q-Rich, Nash leads the Suns to the top of the West.
2004-2005: Nash joins the Suns and complete turns them around.
What was the one thing people focused on with Chris Paul while he was the favorite: he saved New Orleans basketball and took the team from being out of the playoffs to first in the West.
Unless the Lakers give the media some kind of story that will sell, don't expect Kobe to get the MVP.
Look for James to get the award if Cleveland gets anywhere near 50+ wins. If not, I fully expect the award to go to Chris Paul since he supposedly "deserved" it this year as well.
Would winning 70+ games be special enough or would it just be because they had Bynum, Gasol, and Kobe and that they would get split votes? (kind of like the Celtics in the 2007-2008 NBA season)

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#12
Posted July 25, 2008 - 09:44 PM
If Kobe and the Lakers win 70 games, you can pencil Bryant in as the winner. His statistics will be among the top 5, as always, and reaching the 70 game plateau is a much greater story than simply coming close to doing it.

#13
Posted July 26, 2008 - 11:04 AM
Kobe Bryant will not win the MVP next year unless the Lakers do something extraordinary.
Why? Because in order to win the MVP, there must be something special about your season. Remember, this is the MEDIA who chooses the winner of the award. It is all about marketability and the best thing to market is a good story.
2007-2008: Lakers go from turmoil to top team in the West.
2006-2007: In general this was a slow year, but Dirk's team winning 67 games was the huge story.
2005-2006: Even without Amare, JJ, and Q-Rich, Nash leads the Suns to the top of the West.
2004-2005: Nash joins the Suns and complete turns them around.
What was the one thing people focused on with Chris Paul while he was the favorite: he saved New Orleans basketball and took the team from being out of the playoffs to first in the West.
Unless the Lakers give the media some kind of story that will sell, don't expect Kobe to get the MVP.
Look for James to get the award if Cleveland gets anywhere near 50+ wins. If not, I fully expect the award to go to Chris Paul since he supposedly "deserved" it this year as well.
Yeah I COMPLETELY agree. Kobe became MVP because everyone thought he was going to be traded.. and no one thought he would bring the Lakers to 1st place in the toughest Western Conference ever. Not to mention all of the damn injuries his teammates had.

#14
Posted July 26, 2008 - 12:48 PM
#16
Posted July 26, 2008 - 06:43 PM
mark my words ... he will win it again!!

#17
Posted July 26, 2008 - 06:43 PM
I don't think he'll get the minutes to do it man (30ppg). Too many blow outs. With Bynum back in the fold, I expect his FGA to decrease instead of increase. Maybe a rise in efficiency will make up for the difference?He'll put up 30/5/7asst next year. If the Lakers win 65+, its his.
I actually expect a very similar line to this season with increased efficiency, assist rates, and a decrease in turnover rates. His usage and minutes will decline as well.
If we do win 65+ games, I think he has an EXCELLENT chance especially if James fails to win 50+. I truly believe the most significant factor in the MVP voting is the player's storyline. I don't know if anyone has read my blog about why Kobe deserved MVP, but I think there is significant evidence to show that is indeed the case.

#18
Posted July 26, 2008 - 06:45 PM

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











